On the new iPod Nano…
Sep9
I am not going to hide the fact that I am a Zune fan. But, it wasn’t too long ago that I was a huge iPod fan. I did own the mini and I occasionally still use my Nano in the car. So, I feel like I still have enough perspective to write a post about the new iPod Nano. Keep in mind that I have not touched or used the device, so these are just my initial reactions to the announcement today.
So, here is my reaction to the new iPod Nano… Apple, WTF?
First, why a curved screen? I thought that when Sony released the Trinitron in the 90s that the battle between flat screens and curved screens was over. It was like Rengel called up Cupertino and said “I would like to go back to a curved screen…you can always just close the blinds in your house to get rid of the glare” (Sorry, for the cheap shot Rengel, but you did question my manhood in the comments of Weekend Wrapup). I am guessing this was a design choice. However, I doubt that this would work well in real life.
Second, what is the point of shake-to-shuffle and an accelerometer? Is this what people really want? If so, I am really out-of-touch. As a past owner, I left because the device was less intuitive than the Zune, had less features (subscription service, social community, FM transmitter, WiFi), and overall had a less appealing design. None of these issues have been corrected. But, I can at least shuffle my songs with a good shake. I am sure that will come in handy. I will give Apple points for the genius recommendation system; although the name could use some work. Unfortunately for them, unlike “Danger Beach”, it is not a working title.
I really feel that Apple has now just pushed the Nano aside to concentrate on the iPhone. The last two iPod updates have been incremental, at best. But, maybe that is the point—for Apple, the iPod has now become a commodity and all the innovation will be left to the iPhone. But, even at the software level, I think there is a lot more that can be done in this arena.
So, that is my take. I am not ga-ga over the device like the all-to-predictable Gizmodo. I think this round of personal PMPs was quite uninspired. So, what do you think?

September 9th, 2008 at 2:17 pm
I love the Entourage reference. I do know people (running freaks) that are all about the Nike integration so they will love the built in accelerometer instead of having a separate one that you either put on your shoe or somewhere else.
September 9th, 2008 at 2:22 pm
The accelerometer only flips the screen when you flip it to a different orientation. I am not sure what the point is on a small device.
They do have the built-in Nike integration, but I thought that was only on the touch. I think that device is way too big for running. To my knowledge, the Nano does not have the built-in Nike integration.
September 9th, 2008 at 2:27 pm
So, that was quick. http://gizmodo.com/5047450/confirmed-nike%252B-only-works-with-2nd-gen-ipod-touch-not-iphone-or-1st-gen-itouch
Nike+ only works with touch. I think someone would look pretty weird with that thing strapped to their ARM. But, I have seen people with iPhones attached to their arm when running. But, those people seem to be the type most likely to drive BMWs while wearing Crocs–I am just saying.
September 10th, 2008 at 11:01 am
You are the Archie Bunker of technology blogging.